Access reviewEngineering · Q4 2026
Reviewed
| Seat | System | Level | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| QA Engineer | GitHub | Write | Signed |
| Web Developer | GitHub | Admin | Removal overdue |
| SRE | GCP | Owner | Not verified |
| Data Analyst | Snowflake | Analyst | Review due |
The next audit is
a question.
Every line comes from a recorded decision. So the report can be signed, not just read.
Q4 access review for Engineering, as a table.
The ones teams ask for most.
Periodic review
Everything a team holds, who approved it, and when the review is due.
Offboarding check
What a leaver held, what was removed, and what still waits on someone.
Personal history
One person's access, requests, approvals, and grants, in order.
Privileged inventory
Admin and critical access across the organization, verified or not.
Approver activity
What someone signed, and which grants later went overdue.
Findings digest
Open findings by severity, with the responsible step and person.
Responsibility,
not blame.
A finding names the step that failed and who held it. An approval that was right when given stays right, even if the grant later goes stale.
- Every row links back to the recorded decision.
- Overdue removals name the provisioner, not the approver.
- Repeat findings show the pattern, not a ranking of people.
Ask once.
Sign the answer.
$12 per person, per month. Every feature included.